Question

In 2001, a group of students and parents in Texas took a school district to court contending that the school's mandatory uniform policy violated first amendment rights. The Fifth Circuit Court ruled that the school's policy was constitutional and that students had failed to show that the policy suppressed free expression (ACLU). Look at the works cited below and then select the article that belongs to the citation.

Answer 1

A group of students in Texas contested a mandatory school uniform policy as a violation of the First Amendment, but the Fifth Circuit Court upheld the policy. The reference to 'Tinker v. Des Moines' suggests a similar background of students' symbolic expression rights on school property within the context of the First Amendment.

Step-by-step explanation:

The case in question pertains to the balance between school uniform policies and First Amendment rights. When considering the school district in Texas that implemented a uniform policy contested as being a violation of the First Amendment, the Fifth Circuit Court upheld the policy, stating that it did not infringe upon students' rights to free expression as per the ACLU.

A related landmark case is Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, where the Supreme Court recognized that wearing armbands in public schools as a symbolic protest is indeed protected by the First Amendment. This set a precedent that students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech on school premises, as long as their conduct does not cause material and substantial disruption to school operations.

In the scenario described, where the article from the works cited matches the court case discussed, the closest match would be the one referencing Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, as it directly deals with symbolic expression in school and the limits to First Amendment rights within an educational setting.