Final answer:
The statement is false; Apple Inc. is a prime example of a transnational corporation due to its integrated global supply chain, international manufacturing and assembly operations, as well as its complex relationship with competitors such as Samsung.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that Apple would not be considered a very good example of a transnational corporation is false. Apple Inc. is indeed considered a transnational corporation, as it operates globally with a complex and integrated supply chain. Apple designs its products in the United States, has components manufactured by various international suppliers, assembles the products in different countries like China, and provides customer service through outsourced centers in countries such as India. This global assembly line exemplifies the workings of a transnational corporation, as Apple manages resources, markets, and products across numerous national boundaries.
Furthermore, Apple's relationship with Samsung, its biggest supplier and competitor, underscores the interconnectedness of the modern global economy. Despite their competition in the consumer market, the two companies engage in a mutually beneficial exchange that allows each to focus on its strengths, highlighting the cooperative aspect of transnational business practices.