89.8k views
5 votes
How did governments address the issue of fading enthusiasm for the war within their populations?

1) They promised there would be no more wars.
2) They used propaganda to stir up emotions.
3) They allowed soldiers more time to visit their families.
4) They provided extra food and supplies to civilians.

User Liwevire
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

Governments have used propaganda to maintain support for wars, controlling the economy through rationing and production management, and restricting political dissent to keep enthusiasm alive among the population.

Step-by-step explanation:

During times of war, governments have historically taken measures to bolster waning enthusiasm for the conflict among their populations. One of the main strategies used has been propaganda campaigns aimed at maintaining public support. These campaigns employed various forms of media, such as radio broadcasts, films, and posters, to stir patriotic feelings and emphasize the importance of the war effort. By showcasing material that highlighted the valor of soldiers and the necessity of victory for national survival, governments worked to unify the citizenry and encourage active participation in war-related activities, transforming civilians into citizen soldiers.

Another tactic involved tighter control over the economy, as seen through measures such as rationing of goods, price controls, and taking command of industrial output to ensure that resources were directed towards the war effort. Governments also promoted the significant contributions made by individuals in their everyday lives towards the war, encouraging heightened productivity and sacrifice.

In addition to these efforts, governments during wars like World War I and World War II were known to restrict political dissent, sometimes implementing restrictive laws to minimize opposition and maintain a unified front internally. Identifying with the cause of the war became almost an obligation for citizens, under the weight of national advertising campaigns and legal pressures that made neutrality or dissent increasingly difficult positions to hold publicly.

User Michael Plautz
by
8.0k points