Final answer:
An ethical organization is expected to have a system in place for long-term follow-up evaluations to ensure ongoing ethical integrity and accountability. The absence of such systems is what is not part of the structures and systems pillar of an ethical organization. Other aspects, while important to ethical decision-making, do not replace the need for operational systems that track and maintain ethical standards.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "This points to not having the appropriate systems in place to conduct long-term follow-up evaluations." suggests that a lack of structures for conducting comprehensive evaluations over time is what is not part of the structures and systems pillar of an ethical organization. Essentially, an ethical organization should have established systems that facilitate continuous oversight and improvement. This includes, but is not limited to, ensuring that there are mechanisms for long-term follow-up and assessment of the ethical impact of the organization's activities. Without such systems, there can be insufficient accountability and a potential for unethical practices to go unchecked.
Elements like employing criteria, gleaning insights from ethical theories, and being relative without relativistic are aspects that can contribute to ethical decision-making and can be part of an organization's ethical framework. However, they do not directly address the operational and structural mechanisms—like evaluation systems—that comprise an organization's ability to maintain ethical standards over time. Hence, the regular evaluation of ethical practices is critical for an organization's integrity and accountability.