Final answer:
John Rawls refers to the process of going back and forth from the original position to fine-tune one's intuitions about justice as the reflective equilibrium.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to John Rawls, going back and forth from the original position to one's actual intuitions on justice is referred to as the reflective equilibrium. This process involves testing and refining our sense of justice to align with principles that we would choose under conditions of fairness. The original position is a hypothetical situation wherein individuals choose principles of justice without knowledge of their social status or natural endowments, to ensure impartiality and fairness. By moving toward a reflective equilibrium, we continually adjust our judgments about justice by comparing them with the principles that would be chosen in the original position, thereby attempting to reach a state of coherence between our moral intuitions and the principles of justice.