Final answer:
The Congressional Union, later known as the National Women's Party, differed from NAWSA by focusing on a federal constitutional amendment, employing more confrontational tactics, and advocating for broader women's rights beyond suffrage.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Congressional Union and the National Woman's Party Versus NAWSA
The Congressional Union (later the National Women's Party, NWP) differed significantly from the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) in several key aspects. Firstly, the NWP, led by Alice Paul and Lucy Burns, was formed due to dissatisfaction with NAWSA's state-by-state campaign for women's suffrage. They envisioned a more direct and immediate change through a federal constitutional amendment. Secondly, the NWP employed more confrontational tactics like protests and picketing, including picketing the White House, which eventually led to the arrest and imprisonment of some members. This contrasted with NAWSA's more conservative strategies, which included circulating petitions and lobbying politicians. Thirdly, the NWP was considered more radical and focused on wide-reaching reforms that went beyond suffrage, advocating for broader women's rights issues such as economic rights to own property.
While NAWSA attempted to work within existing political structures and catered to more conservative audiences, the NWP was willing to alienate moderate supporters if it meant pushing the envelope further for women's rights. Although NAWSA was a larger organization, the NWP's aggressive strategies ultimately played a significant role in bringing national attention to the suffrage movement and exerting pressure on political leaders.