Final answer:
The conflict oriented understanding of social change does not typically include technology as the sole driver of social movements; instead, it emphasizes inequalities and power differentials that lead to these changes.
Step-by-step explanation:
A characteristic that is not typical of a conflict oriented understanding of social change is the notion that social changes or movements are driven by technology alone. The conflict perspective emphasizes that social change often stems from inequalities and power differentials within a society, as well as decisions by political and economic leaders that tend to benefit the middle and upper classes. It suggests that major societal shifts occur due to groups with unmet needs and expectations, particularly those in the middle rather than the very bottom of the social hierarchy. This includes the idea that change comes when those with power become involved, as seen in examples like the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street (OWS), rather than being driven solely by technological advancements.
While technology can be a catalyst for social change, as seen in cases where social media enhances communication among activists, it is not the sole driver in the conflict perspective. Moreover, the conflict perspective focuses on the reproduction of inequality, including in areas like media and technology, and how these can exacerbate social divisions.