Final answer:
In product liability cases, the manufacturer, Zulu, could be held liable for the customer's injuries from the defective product. Wholesalers or distributors, like Bravo or Sierra, might also be liable if they knew or should have known about the defect. However, the manufacturer is typically the main party held responsible, especially if aware of defects before distribution.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the described scenario, liability for the customer's injuries from a defective smidgen may extend to multiple parties in the distribution chain. Given the precedent in product liability cases, the manufacturer, Zulu, who created the smidgen, could be held liable for producing a defective product. Under strict liability laws, manufacturers are typically responsible for any defects that occur during the manufacturing process. Additionally, if the wholesaler, Bravo, or the distributor, Sierra, had knowledge of the defect or had the opportunity to inspect the product and failed to do so, they could also be held liable for distributing a defective product. However, the ultimate responsibility often lies with the manufacturer, especially if neither the wholesaler nor distributor had reason to suspect any defect.
Using a counter-example situation, we see that a car manufacturer that proceeds with the sale of a vehicle with known brake defects is found liable for subsequent injuries and deaths. This emphasizes the manufacturer's responsibility when aware of a potential hazard. Similarly, if Zulu knew of the smidgen's defect and still allowed it to be sold, they would likely face liability for the customer's injuries.