Final answer:
The incorrect statement is that both works were designed by László Moholy-Nagy for the inauguration of Bauhaus. The styles in question actually relate more to the Constructivist movement, particularly to figures like Alexander Rodchenko and Vladimir Tatlin, rather than the Bauhaus, which was founded by Walter Gropius in Germany.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Both of them are designed by László Moholy-Nagy for the inauguration of Bauhaus' is incorrect. While Moholy-Nagy was a significant figure associated with the Bauhaus school, where he was indeed a teacher and designed its buildings, the works in question have a Constructivist background, which is more closely related to Russian artists like Alexander Rodchenko and Vladimir Tatlin. Rodchenko, a renowned artist within the Constructivist movement, often celebrated the image of the Soviet worker through various means, including public art and Agitprop posters. Notably, Vladimir Tatlin's proposal for the Monument to the Third International is a hallmark of Constructivist art, emphasizing a machine aesthetic and celebrating technology. Constructivism and the Bauhaus, while both influential modernist movements, had different origins and key figures. The Bauhaus was founded by Walter Gropius in Germany, and its philosophy centered around the unity of art, craft, and technology in creating functional objects and buildings. In contrast, Constructivism emerged in Russia and was associated with the post-revolution Bolshevik ethos, focusing on industrial materials and utilitarianism in art.