Final answer:
The question deals with feedback techniques and their use in emphasizing and clarifying communication, as well as supporting claims in a discussion. It covers concepts such as repetition, rhetorical questions, confirmation bias, dialectic dialogue, and active engagement with a text.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question relates to feedback techniques and how they are described. The correct description for prompting a speaker to confirm his or her meaning by completing or adding to the original message typically involves the use of feedback techniques like repetition, offering background information, and asking rhetorical questions. These strategies help to clarify and emphasize points during a conversation or in a text. Additionally, supporting claims with convincing evidence such as expert opinions, anecdotes, examples, statistics, and facts are significant ways to strengthen an argument or message.
Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, impacting how information is perceived and arguments are assessed. On the other hand, a dialectic approach involves an exchange of different points of view and is a method used to discover truth through dialogue, often requiring examination and refinement of answers in a structured back-and-forth conversation.
To further understand and evaluate a text's claims and logic, responding or 'talking back' to it in writing can be valuable. This involves analyzing the arguments, evidence, and conclusions more critically and is a form of active engagement with the text that can lead to deeper comprehension and insight.