Final answer:
Those who disagreed with Douglass's views would likely argue that slavery was economically necessary, historically commonplace, divinely sanctioned for the betterment of the enslaved, and a stabilizing social force.
Step-by-step explanation:
Those who disagreed with Frederick Douglass's condemnation of slaveholding and its connection to a hypocritical form of Christianity in his 1845 narrative would most likely make arguments that defended the institution of slavery as being essential to the social and economic fabric of the time. The most probable arguments from that perspective would be:
- The South depends on slave labor, and its abolition would cause the southern economy to crumble.
- Slavery has existed throughout history, dating all the way back to the ancient Greeks and Romans.
- The institution of slavery is divine in origin, and the African race has improved from its civilizing effects.
- Slavery guarantees stability and order between the races in the South.
The proponents of slavery would argue that it was a traditional economic system that maintained social hierarchies and justified itself through a twisted interpretation of religious doctrine.