Final answer:
Paleolithic nomads are NOT considered by scholars as builders of Stonehenge because their nomadic nature would not allow for the sustained effort required to build such a monument, suggesting instead that it was constructed by a Neolithic settled society.
Step-by-step explanation:
Which of these is NOT an issue that scholars use to build interpretations of Stonehenge? Scholars attempting to understand Stonehenge do not typically consider the role of Paleolithic nomads for several reasons. Stonehenge's construction, which began around 3100 BCE, requires a society that was settled and had sophisticated social structures to organize such an effort. The notion that nomads from the Paleolithic era, who would not have had a permanent settlement at the site, might have built Stonehenge does not align with the evidence of the needed continuous labor and resources. The heavy stones and complex construction suggest an organized society during the Neolithic era which could rally the workforce for an extended period, not nomadic people who move frequently. Additionally, the presence of henges throughout Britain indicates a widespread Neolithic cultural practice or ritual, rather than the isolated work of nomadic Paleolithic societies.