Final answer:
The frequency of a due-out review depends on the context. For court decisions, all opinions are released before the Court's summer adjournment, often with controversial decisions announced at the end of the term. In academic publishing, reviews are scheduled before new editions are released.
Step-by-step explanation:
The frequency of a due-out review can vary depending on the specific context in which the term is used. In the context of court decisions, a due-out refers to tasks or actions, such as rulings, that are pending and expected to be finalized. For the Supreme Court, for example, all opinions are announced publicly before the Court adjourns for the summer, with some rulings, particularly the most controversial and hotly debated, being released near or on the last day of the term. Reviews, in a more general sense, whether they pertain to courts or other disciplines, involve reporting and sharing a carefully considered opinion about the subject at hand.
It is also worth noting that reviewers of prior editions, as listed in the reference provided, might suggest that the term due-out review could relate to the process of reviewing new editions of textbooks or academic publications, which is typically a scheduled activity that occurs before new editions are published.