Final answer:
The statement is true; manual processing may still be needed when using a computerized payroll system for testing and handling unusual payment situations that the automated system cannot accommodate.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is true. Even with a computerized payroll system in place, manual processing methods may still be required. These manual checks are critical for testing the system's accuracy and dealing with exceptions or unusual payment scenarios that the automated system may not be able to handle. For example, identifying and correcting a $250,000 overpayment error on an equipment bill would likely involve manual intervention, as not all digital systems are foolproof or capable of managing such complex situations.
While automation in the workplace, including payroll systems, has made many tasks more efficient, it is not a complete replacement for human oversight. Just as a single cashier can now oversee multiple self-scan aisles, a payroll administrator can use digital systems to manage transactions efficiently. However, manual oversight is still necessary to catch and resolve errors.