Question

Typical defects that are easier to find in reviews than in dynamic testing are:

A. Deviations from standards
B. Requirement defects
C. Design defects
D. Insufficient maintainability and incorrect interface specifications
E. All of the above

Answer 1

Easier to find in reviews than in dynamic testing, defects like deviations from standards, requirement defects, design defects, insufficient maintainability, and incorrect interface specifications can be identified before implementation, making option E the correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Typical defects that are easier to find in reviews rather than in dynamic testing include a wide array of issues that can arise before the actual execution of software. These include:

• Deviations from standards: These are often detected in reviews since standards are established benchmarks that can be compared against without needing to run the program.
• Requirement defects: Requirements need to be clear and comprehensive; reviews can catch ambiguities or omissions that testing might not reveal.
• Design defects: In a review, you can verify if the design meets specified requirements and best practices before it becomes more costly to fix in the testing phase.
• Insufficient maintainability and incorrect interface specifications: These types of defects can be identified in a review by scrutinizing documentation and designs for future-proofing issues or interface mismatches.

Therefore, the correct answer to the question is E. All of the above as all these issues are more easily identified during the review process.