Final answer:
Mr. Martin, opposing the slave trade as dishonorable, was likely from a northern state, while Mr. Rutledge's defense of slave importation suggests he was from a southern state.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the quotations provided from James Madison's notes, Mr. Martin proposed a measure to allow a prohibition or tax on the importation of slaves, citing that it was contrary to the principles of the American Revolution and dishonorable to American character. This sentiment suggests that Mr. Martin was likely from a northern state. Mr. Rutledge's response, which considers the economic dependence of states like North Carolina and South Carolina on the slave trade, implies Mr. Rutledge was defending the interests of a southern state. The historical context confirms that during this period, the northern states were gradually moving towards emancipation, whereas southern states like South Carolina and Georgia were adamantly opposed to any restrictions on slavery, as they heavily relied on slave labor for their economic prosperity.