Final answer:
The sentence in question is not a run-on sentence, as it properly uses a semicolon and a transitional phrase to connect two independent clauses. The correct answer is option (2) No.
Step-by-step explanation:
The sentence in question is NOT a run-on sentence. It is a compound sentence properly connected by a semicolon, followed by the transitional phrase 'furthermore'. This kind of sentence structure is acceptable and follows standard rules of English punctuation where two independent clauses are linked by a semicolon and a transitional phrase.
For example:
- Example 1 - The roof of that car was covered in Astroturf; a strange sight!
- Example 2 - Quentin's father gave him a golden pocket watch; which was a priceless family heirloom.
In essence, the sentence shared by the student is correctly punctuated and expresses two related but independent thoughts without creating a run-on. It's much like Example 1 where the semicolon is correctly used. The correct answer is option (2) No.