Question

You are testing a new version of software for a coffee machine. The machine can prepare differenttypes of coffee based on four categories. i.e., coffee size, sugar, milk, and syrup. The criteria areas follows:

- Coffee size (small, medium, large)
- Sugar (none, 1 unit, 2 units, 3 units, 4 units)
- Milk (yes or no)
- Coffee flavor syrup (no syrup, caramel, hazelnut, vanilla)
Now you are writing a defect report with the following information:
- Title: Low coffee temperature.
- Short summary: When you select coffee with milk, the time for preparing coffee is too long and the temperature of the beverage is too low (less than 40 °C).
- Expected result: The temperature of coffee should be standard (about 75 °C).
- Degree of risk: Medium
- Priority: Normal
What valuable information was omitted in the above defect report?
A. The actual test results
B. Identification of the tested software version
C. Status of the defect
D. Ideas for improving the test case

Answer 1

The defect report about low coffee temperature for the new software of a coffee machine is missing four crucial pieces of information: the actual test results, identification of the tested software version, status of the defect, and ideas for improving the test case.

Step-by-step explanation:

When writing a defect report for the testing of new software for a coffee machine, it is crucial to include valuable information that can assist in the identification, reproduction, and correction of the issue. In the provided defect report for the low coffee temperature issue, some important details are omitted that would enhance the report's usefulness. Specifically, the report should include:

• The actual test results showing the exact temperature readings obtained during testing.
• Identification of the tested software version to ensure that any fixes are applied to the correct version of the software.
• The status of the defect, noting whether it is new, in progress, resolved, or closed.
• Ideas for improving the test case could also be included to ensure more comprehensive testing in the future.

While it is good to pass critical information such as the title, short summary, expected result, degree of risk, and priority, the additional details mentioned would provide a complete picture of the issue and facilitate the debugging process.