Final answer:
According to Christensen's principles of disruptive innovations, the statement 'Not every new idea can be protected with a patent or a copyright, for example, a new way of organizing a factory or a new way of training employees' is false.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the context of technology as an agent of social change, the statement 'Not every new idea can be protected with a patent or a copyright, for example, a new way of organizing a factory or a new way of training employees' is not true according to Christensen's five principles of disruptive innovations.
Christensen's five principles state that disruptive innovations target non-consuming or underserved customers in a different way than the established products. Examples of disruptive innovations include the personal computer and smartphones, which entered the market and eventually replaced traditional mainframe computers and landline phones.
Therefore, when sociologists think about technology as an agent of social change, the mentioned statement does not align with disruptive innovations as it implies that all new ideas are protected and not disruptive.