Register
Why were no weapons of mass destruction actually used?
56.2k views
13 votes
Why were no weapons of mass destruction actually used?

User Frank Zalkow
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

9 votes

Answer:

it would not mean the end of civilization. conflict would be slower and immediately less destructive than a nuclear one

User Gadu
by
8.1k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

8.9m questions

11.5m answers

Other Questions

is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
What military strategy defeated Cornwallis at Yorktown?
Link Copied!