Final answer:
The statement that different categories assigned varied roles should allocate different percentages of resources by the retailer is true. The correct answer is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the allocation of resources by a retailer to different categories that are assigned different roles within the retail business. The allocation of resources is a strategic decision that retailers must make to optimize their business operations. The assumption that different categories should receive varying percentages of resources is a reflection of the fact that some categories may contribute more significantly to the retailer's goals, be it in terms of revenue, customer traffic, or strategic importance. Retailers analyze a variety of factors, such as sales data, customer demand, and profit margins to determine how to best allocate resources among different categories.
Looking at the options provided, they are incomplete or irrelevant to the question at hand, giving us reason to believe this is a trick question or there may have been some confusion in the question provided.
Nonetheless, based on the logic of retail resource allocation, it can be said that the statement is B) True. Different categories perform differently and will require a varied amount of investment and support. For instance, a high-performing category that is a major traffic driver may need more promotional resources, while a lower-performing category might require a reevaluation of stock levels or pricing strategies to optimize for maximum efficiency and profitability.