Final answer:
Granny objects to the use of explicit language in the names of places, preferring to avoid such impropriety. Language varies by region and community, and formal or standard English is often required in professional contexts. Language use can signify identity and adapt to new societal concepts. So, the correct option is d) The use of explicit language
Step-by-step explanation:
Granny's objection in the statement "I wouldn't stay no place that has to be spelt in mixed company" refers to d) The use of explicit language.
Granny implies that certain places have names that are so vulgar or inappropriate that they should not be spelled or pronounced in polite or mixed company, indicating a sensitivity to propriety and decorum in language.
This sentiment echoes the social norms that often dictate the appropriateness of language used in different settings and among various company.
Variations in language, including the use of slang, colloquialisms, or region-specific terms, can shape how communities communicate and can denote aspects of identity, such as geographical location or social background. For instance, within certain communities, like the southern United States, phrases such as y'all and ain't are part of the regional dialect, though they differ from standard English.
These distinctions in language use are also important in professional settings, where more standard or formal English is typically expected.
Someone, particularly those from different regions or ethnic backgrounds, may switch between informal and formal language styles depending on the context, a practice known as code-switching.
Language and culture are deeply interconnected, and the evolution of language to adapt to new concepts reflects the ever-changing nature of society.
Therefore, the correct option is d) The use of explicit language