Final answer:
Tills makes a point by describing the British colonial rule as 'Sakar ki Churi', indicating a rule that seemed smooth and sweet yet was ultimately harmful.
This metaphorical critique of British economic policies in India subtly challenges British governance without direct disparagement, and together with other historical accounts, reflects the complex evaluations of British imperialism.
Step-by-step explanation:
The excerpts provided illustrate the nuanced and complex relationship between Britain and its colonies, particularly India and North America. Dadabhai Naoroji's term 'Sakar ki Churi' metaphorically highlights the bittersweet nature of British colonialism in India: beneficial in some respects yet ultimately harmful.
This term alone encapsulates a critical viewpoint that conveys disapproval of British policies without overtly disparaging the British government. Similarly, references to American reactions to British policies, such as the Boston Tea Party and arguments against virtual representation, underscore dissatisfaction with and resistance to British economic and political practices.
Without direct disparagement, these instances underscore the tension and dissatisfaction with British rule: Naoroji's critique of British economic policies in India, the American colonists' protest against taxation without representation, and Britons' own criticism of colonial governance.