Final answer:
In Act I of 'Julius Caesar', there is no rush to judgment by Caesar described in the options provided. The consequences of Caesar's actions are a result of the broader political tensions in Rome, and the rush to judgment is more aptly attributed to the conspirators' decision to assassinate him later in the play.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Act I of Julius Caesar, the idea of a rush to judgment leading to trouble for Julius Caesar is not explicitly presented through the options provided. The closest action related to judgment by Caesar at this early point in the play is his dismissal of the Soothsayer's warning with the famous line, “He is a dreamer; let us leave him: pass”. However, this is not an immediate embrace of the Soothsayer's warning, hence it is incorrect to claim Caesar stayed home as a result.
Moreover, throughout the play, Julius Caesar does not hastily decide to dismiss his security detail, nor does Caesar quickly accept the crown offered by conspirators; in fact, in the play, he refuses it. Caesar does not impulsively grant clemency to Cassius. Therefore, none of the options provided (a through d) accurately depict how a rush to judgment leads to trouble for Julius Caesar in Act I.
The true trouble for Julius Caesar stems from the deep political conflicts and the distrust between him and certain Senators, which ultimately culminated in his assassination. The rush to judgment can be better understood as the conspirators' hasty decision to assassinate Caesar without fully considering the consequences of their actions, which unfolds later in the play.