Final answer:
Hedonism is not a philosophical principle aimed at guiding principled decision-making; it is associated more with personal pleasure-seeking. In contrast, utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics are classic philosophical principles that deal with ethical behavior and moral considerations.
Step-by-step explanation:
In decision-making, hedonism is not primarily a philosophical principle aimed at behavior in a principled manner. Instead, utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics are the philosophical principles typically regarded to help behave in a principled manner. Utilitarianism posits that the morality of an action is determined by the happiness or utility it produces for the greatest number, a perspective focused on consequences. Deontology focuses on duties and rules, asserting that actions are right if they align with a correct rule or duty. Virtue ethics emphasizes the development of moral character and habits, suggesting that right actions come from a virtuous character.
Hedonism, on the other hand, is a viewpoint that equates the good with the pursuit of pleasure and is typically associated with personal pleasure-seeking rather than principled decision-making in the ethical sense. There is a form of hedonism that is encompassed by utilitarianism, but it is specifically the pursuit of collective happiness or pleasure, rather than individual pleasure as in pure hedonism.