Question

How did NAWSA and the NWP differ in the tactics they used to get suffrage?

A) NAWSA primarily used peaceful and non-confrontational tactics, such as lobbying, grassroots organizing, and state-level campaigns to gain support for suffrage. In contrast, the NWP adopted more militant strategies, including protests, hunger strikes, and picketing the White House.

B) NAWSA and NWP both focused on peaceful lobbying efforts and grassroots organizing, but NAWSA was more active in advocating for suffrage at the state level, while NWP concentrated on national-level protests and civil disobedience.

C) NAWSA and NWP both relied on confrontational tactics, such as protests and hunger strikes, but NAWSA was more focused on gaining public support and working with sympathetic politicians, while NWP emphasized direct action and civil disobedience.

D) NAWSA and NWP had similar approaches, with both organizations primarily utilizing peaceful lobbying and grassroots efforts to gain suffrage rights for women, but they occasionally engaged in more confrontational tactics when deemed necessary.

Answer 1

NAWSA and the NWP differed in their tactics for suffrage. NAWSA attracted middle-class women and focused on peaceable methods like petitioning and lobbying politicians. The NWP, on the other hand, appealed to the working class, used more confrontational tactics like protests and picketing, and sought to deny African Americans the vote.

Step-by-step explanation:

B. NAWSA attracted mostly middle-class women while NWP appealed to the working class.

C. The NWP favored more confrontational tactics like protests and picketing while NAWSA circulated petitions and lobbied politicians.

D. The NWP sought to deny African Americans the vote, but NAWSA wanted to enfranchise all women.