Final answer:
Reviewers begin their work by investigating background and context, analyzing the broader cultural and historical framework of the work to provide a well-informed and insightful review. They consider the author’s background, themes, and artistic construction of the work, supported by specific evidence and proper citation of secondary sources.
Step-by-step explanation:
When reviewers start their work, they typically begin by investigating background and context. This initial exploration helps them to understand the artistic work within its larger cultural and historical framework, which is essential for providing an insightful review. By grounding their analysis in research, reviewers ensure that they can accurately guide audiences on how to view and interpret a work within its larger cultural context, considering factors such as the author's background, the motivation behind the work's themes and characters, and the piece's artistic construction.
Moreover, this process often includes examining the broader context in which the work was produced and consulting the work of other literary critics. This approach allows for a distinction between the production's artistic choices and the work itself, ensuring a review is well-supported with specific evidence, such as quotations or secondary sources, which must be properly cited to avoid plagiarism.
In summary, to conduct a comprehensive review, it's critical for reviewers to analyze the background and context of the subject, consider the existing literature, and then synthesize this information with their informed perspective to offer a clear judgment or evaluation of the subject that includes both objective observations and subjective analysis.