Final answer:
The word "triumph" does mean to be victorious, which is true. The victory of William Henry Harrison over Martin Van Buren in 1840 was a defeat for the Democratic Party, and not a victory, therefore the statement is false. According to John Locke, the Glorious Revolution was legitimate, which is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
To "triumph" (v.) is to be victorious is true. The term triumph is commonly used to describe the act of winning or being successful in a conflict or competition.
In the context of history, this concept aligns with the principles outlined in reference 17 where winning is described through strategic measures in warfare. The items listed shed light on the multifaceted nature of achieving victory, such as understanding the right timing for battle and having a unified force.
However, in reference 3, William Henry Harrison's defeat over Martin Van Buren in the presidential election of 1840 was not a victory for the Democratic Party but rather for the Whig Party, making the statement false. William Henry Harrison was from the Whig Party, therefore his victory represented a defeat for the Democratic Party.
Additionally, reference to John Locke's perspective on the Glorious Revolution corroborates that it was considered a legitimate change, indicating the statement to be true.