109k views
2 votes
Compared with volume acquisition, axial acquisition results in:

a) increased noise.
b) lower partial volume averaging.
c) better high-contrast resolution.
d) thinner slices

User Bostone
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Compared with volume acquisition, axial acquisition through a CT or CAT scanner results in lower partial volume averaging due to the precise cross-sectional images generated by imaging in narrow slices.

Step-by-step explanation:

Compared with volume acquisition, axial acquisition results in lower partial volume averaging. This is because axial acquisition acquires images of the body in narrow slices over a range of directions using a computed tomography (CT) scanner, also known as a computed axial tomography (CAT) scanner. Each 'slice' is acquired individually as the patient moves through the scanner, which allows for detailed cross-sectional images. By doing so, it minimizes the overlap of structures within a slice and provides a more precise representation, thereby reducing partial volume averaging. This is unlike volume acquisition, where larger volumes can lead to more averaging of different tissue densities within a single voxel, potentially obscuring fine details.

User Tonie
by
8.1k points