53.5k views
2 votes
In Part II, chapter 1, Winstons explains why is a person's privacy no safer in the countryside than in London. Why not?

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

In Orwell's narrative, privacy is compromised in the countryside due to the all-encompassing surveillance state which employs telescreens and informants to keep individuals under watchful scrutiny.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of George Orwell's novel, a person's privacy is not safer in the countryside than in London because the surveillance state depicted in the book extends beyond the city limits. The Party's watchful eye reaches into all areas, making privacy virtually non-existent anywhere. The omnipresence of telescreens and the organization of informant networks ensure that individuals are under constant scrutiny, whether in urban or rural settings. The protagonist, Winston, recognizes this lack of privacy and the risk of surveillance even in perceived safe havens.

User Djdanlib
by
7.6k points