Final answer:
True, critical sociology generally holds the view that research is subjective because it is influenced by societal power structures and rejects the principle of objectivity. It aligns with post-modern perspectives that deny an objective reality, suggesting that truths are constructed by social processes, norms, and values.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Critical sociology rejects the principle of objectivity and claims that all research is subjective' is generally true. Critical sociology, informed by theorists such as those from the Frankfurt School who follow the tradition of Karl Marx, posits that social research cannot be completely objective. This view is predicated on the belief that all academic pursuits, including social sciences, are inherently influenced by power dynamics and societal structures. Hence, research outcomes are seen as reflective of these influences and thus are subjective. Moreover, critical sociologists contend that research may either legitimize and rationalize systems of social power and oppression or serve to liberate from inequality and impose restriction on human freedom. This approach aligns with the views of post-modern pragmatists like Richard Rorty, who argue that there is no objective truth, only truths that are subject to a society's criteria for justification.
In critical sociology, the anticipation of an objective reality is dismissed in favor of the notion that social processes, cultural norms, and societal values shape our understanding of the truth, leading to multiple concurrent truths as informed by different power structures.