Final answer:
Scientific sociology seeks an objective reality through the use of scientific methods, striving to be as objective as possible and acknowledge the difficulty of achieving complete value neutrality. Different philosophical views may influence what is considered truth within specific conceptual frameworks in sociology.
Step-by-step explanation:
Scientific sociology does indeed aim to see an objective reality. It follows a systematic process of collecting and analyzing data, emphasizing the use of the scientific method to maintain as much objectivity as possible. Sociologists like Emile Durkheim believed that societies could be studied objectively by examining social facts, which could indicate if a society was "healthy" or "pathological". Whilst value neutrality is a goal in scientific sociology, many sociologists recognize that complete objectivity may be unattainable. Researchers strive to set aside personal biases and focus on empirical evidence, understanding that studies can include a certain degree of value bias. Findings are supposed to be reported accurately, regardless of whether they align with the researchers' personal beliefs or societal expectations.
However, the truth in scientific sociology, as in other branches of science, can be seen through different lenses. Some adopt a realist view believing that verified predictions through empirical testing represent truth, while others may hold an instrumentalist or conceptual relativist perspective, which views truth as relative and tied to the conceptual framework within which it is understood. Thus, there can be a recognition that multiple truths may exist depending on different groups' criteria for verification and acceptance.