Final answer:
The discussion of different views of justice centers on its nature and relationship with individuals and the state, exploring the balance between personal freedom and societal fairness.
Step-by-step explanation:
The discussion of the three views of justice leads to the main point or argument emphasizing the nature of justice and its relationship to the individual and the state. The various dialogues and theoretical models circle around how goods and services should be distributed in a society. They pose fundamental questions such as if justice is an instrument in the hands of the powerful, or if it has intrinsic value. Plato’s The Republic in particular, investigates the topic through the construction of an ideal city, probing the duties of different classes and the development of guardians who are virtuous leaders. The economic arguments also bring attention to the tension between liberty and equality, scrutinizing the distribution of wealth and the balance of property rights with social fairness.
Plato’s theory asserts that justice is both an individual virtue and a structural social requirement for a harmonious society. The ideologies explored thus converge on the idea that, despite divergent approaches, a just society attempts at equitable distribution of opportunities, resources, and rights, taking into consideration both individual merit and collective welfare. This debate highly interlinks with the concepts of distributive justice and how they apply to modern-day issues regarding the distribution of goods and services.