Final answer:
In a city governed in the best and freest way from faction, it is more likely to be ruled by those who are not eager to rule as they are less likely to abuse power. However, the answer may depend on the circumstances and the individual's character.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a city that is governed in the way that is best and freest from faction, it is more likely to be ruled by those who are not eager to rule. This is because those who are not eager to rule are less likely to abuse power and prioritize their own interests over the well-being of the city and its citizens.
Historically, philosophers like Plato and Aristotle believed that the ideal ruler should be virtuous and have the best interests of the community at heart. They were concerned that rulers who were eager for power might become tyrannical or prioritize the interests of a specific faction instead of the entire city. Therefore, they argued for rule by those who are not eager to rule, or by a group of virtuous rulers.
However, it is important to note that the answer to this question may depend on the circumstances and the individual's character. In some cases, there may be individuals who are eager to rule but also possess the necessary virtues and qualities to govern a city in the best and freest way from faction.