Final answer:
Plato would likely not be optimistic or certain that a technology could fully reconcile ontology and epistemology based on his focus on the importance of dialogic and dialectic processes in pursuing knowledge and truth.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Plato's dialogue, there is no explicit mention of a technology that bridges the gap between ontology and epistemology. However, based on the philosophical skepticism that is characteristic of Plato's work, we can infer his position on the potential for such technology. Plato and his teacher Socrates both advocated for the importance of internal consistency and justification of beliefs, rather than absolute certainty, when it comes to knowledge. They promote the idea that through dialogue and the dialectic process, a better understanding and examination of beliefs can occur. Considering this, Plato would likely be neither optimistic nor certain that any technology could provide complete coherence in our lives. Rather, the approach that Socrates and Plato adopted indicates a recognition that knowledge is a justified true belief that requires rigorous discussion and contemplation. The ideal of technology providing accounts of our lives that are completely coherent to ourselves and to one another would seem to contradict the perpetual search for truth advocated by Socrates and Plato, where questioning and philosophical inquiry are never truly complete.