Final answer:
Strict interpretation of laws means interpreting them according to the original intention of the lawmakers, while broad interpretation takes into account circumstances beyond the original lawmakers' expectations. Contextual interpretation considers both the original intent and current context, and literal interpretation means understanding the law exactly as written.
Step-by-step explanation:
When it comes to interpreting laws, including the constitution, there are different approaches that can be taken. One perspective is that laws should be interpreted strictly according to the original intention of the lawmakers. This approach, known as strict interpretation, seeks to adhere closely to what the framers of the law intended at the time it was written. On the other hand, some argue for a broader interpretation, which takes into account circumstances and contexts that the original lawmakers could not have foreseen. This approach argues that the law should be adaptable to changing times and evolving societal needs. There is also a contextual interpretation, which considers both the original intent of the law as well as the current context in which it is being applied. Finally, a literal interpretation would suggest that the law should be understood exactly as it is written, without any additional considerations.