Final answer:
The care and future planning for Mr. Kirby follows a long term, stable and not easily changed time orientation, reflecting a necessity for consistent preparation over time that contrasts with the variable nature of short-term planning.
Step-by-step explanation:
The care and future planning provided to Mr. Kirby follow a distinct long term, stable and not easily changed time orientation. When we talk about time orientations in planning, especially in contexts like healthcare or government policy, it's essential to distinguish between short-term and long-term outlooks. Short-term plans, such as a or c, can be characterized as variable, unstable, and short term, and can quickly change as situations demand. In contrast, long-term goals, like option d, are stable and are not easily altered, mirroring the need for consistent care and preparation for the future in Mr. Kirby's case.
Considering different situations, such as authoritarian governments versus democratic elections, helps to illustrate the challenges and considerations of planning over various time frames. Authoritarian regimes, for example, might have the upper hand in imposing long-term sacrifices and planning due to their nature, as opposed to democratic systems, which are often constrained by short election cycles. These examples underline the importance of time orientation in effective planning and decision-making, whether in personal care scenarios or wider governmental policies.