177k views
5 votes
1952 American Pharmaceutical Association (APhA-now) Code of ethics:

A) Prioritizing profit over patient well-being
B) Upholding professional integrity and ethical conduct
C) Advocating for unrestricted access to medication
D) Promoting experimental drug use without regulation

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The 1952 APhA Code of Ethics emphasized upholding professional integrity and ethical conduct. The 'anonymous losers' in the context of FDA drug regulations are those who suffer from delays in drug availability due to strict safety and efficacy testing.

Additionally, for-profit pharmaceutical companies face an ethical dilemma between profit motives and the duty to prioritize public health.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student's question concerns the 1952 American Pharmaceutical Association (APhA-now) Code of ethics, specifically which principle was outlined in this historical document. The correct answer is B) Upholding professional integrity and ethical conduct.

This means that the APhA emphasized the importance of pharmacists maintaining a high level of ethical behavior in their profession, prioritizing patient care and well-being over other considerations, such as profit.

When considering the regulation of medicines by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which ensures safety and efficacy of drugs sold in the United States, there is a balance of interests.

On one hand, patients are protected by these regulations, which prevent unsafe drugs from reaching the market. On the other hand, strict medical regulations can lead to delayed access to potentially beneficial drugs for patients with no other options, making these individuals the 'anonymous losers' who may suffer due to the lengthy process of drug approval.

Furthermore, the ethical dilemma faced by for-profit pharmaceutical companies is the tension between their obligation to generate profit and the moral imperative to develop drugs that may have high utility but lower profitability. Questions on whether government subsidies are sufficient to steer drug companies towards prioritizing public interest or if government agencies should take direct responsibility in drug development shed light on the complex interplay between ethics, profit, and health.

User Sudarshan Bhat
by
7.8k points