Final answer:
The incorrect statement about the civil war between Berkeley and Bacon is that 'It marked a turning point in colonial history.' Bacon's Rebellion led to the burning of Jamestown and arose from disputes over Native American policies and tensions in Virginia, but did not drastically change the colony's power dynamics.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that is NOT true of the civil war between Berkeley and Bacon is: 'It marked a turning point in colonial history.' Although Bacon's Rebellion was a significant event, it did not shift the power dynamics in Virginia dramatically; instead, it eventually consolidated power within a small group of elite families and accelerated the transition from indentured servitude to slavery.
During Bacon's Rebellion, Nathaniel Bacon did indeed lead forces that burned down Jamestown and the conflict arose mainly over issues related to Native American relations. Furthermore, the dispute between Bacon and Governor William Berkeley led to significant loss of life. The rebellion showed the potential for larger political and economic tensions within the colonies.
However, the rebellion did not mark a decisive turning point because the power structure returned to the previous status quo following the deaths of both Bacon and Berkeley and the end of hostilities. It did, however, lead to changes in labor practices and influence subsequent interactions between colonists and Native American tribes.