Final answer:
Option A, the presence of a bulge of stars at the center of a galaxy, is not direct evidence for a supermassive black hole; rather, it is a correlated feature. Direct evidence includes the motion of stars, radiation from accretion disks, and material jets, indicating a highly dense central mass.
Step-by-step explanation:
The piece of evidence that is NOT for supermassive black holes (SMBHs) being at the centers of galaxies is A. The presence of a bulge of stars at the center of the galaxy. Although the mass of the central bulge of a galaxy does correlate with the mass of the SMBH at the center, the bulge itself is not direct evidence for a black hole. Evidence for SMBHs includes high-velocity stars orbiting the galaxy's center, accretion disks emitting intense radiation, and material jets ejecting from the core. All these phenomena suggest a mass that is so dense that nothing other than a SMBH could explain the gravitational forces at play.