Final answer:
b) should be open to empirical verification. A scientific hypothesis should be open to empirical verification and can be tested through experimentation or observation. It must be something that can be supported or refuted through carefully crafted experimentation or observation.
Step-by-step explanation:
A scientific hypothesis should be open to empirical verification. It must be something that can be supported or refuted through carefully crafted experimentation or observation. The most straightforward approach to testing a hypothesis in science is to perform an experiment. If the experiment is conducted properly, its results either agree with the predictions of the hypothesis or contradict it.
A scientific hypothesis is a testable and falsifiable statement that serves as a basis for empirical investigation. It should be formulated in a way that allows it to be subjected to empirical observation and testing. Hypotheses are designed to be either supported or refuted through experimentation and observation of the real world. Option a) is not entirely accurate because while logic and disputation play a role, the crucial aspect is empirical verification through observation and experimentation. Option c) is also not accurate because hypotheses can arise from intuition, but they must ultimately be tested empirically to be considered scientific. The most accurate statement is option b).