Final answer:
Without a valid will, Ronnie's joint properties would pass directly to his spouse, Sweet Emily. The properties held as tenants in common and in Ronnie's sole name would be distributed according to intestacy laws, which generally favor the surviving spouse and children. The BMW left to a witness would also be subject to the intestacy rules.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Ronnie Butler's will is considered invalid, his estate would be distributed according to the intestacy laws of his jurisdiction. Since Ronnie and Sweet Emily owned several properties as joint tenants, these properties would pass directly to Sweet Emily, in full, upon Ronnie's death due to the right of survivorship characteristic of joint tenancy. This includes the family home, a triplex, and the three parcels of beach front property in Abaco.
The two lots in Lyford Cay owned by Ronnie and Sweet Emily as tenants in common would not pass automatically to Sweet Emily. Instead, her share would remain with her, and Ronnie’s share would be distributed as part of his estate. The five lots in Winton, owned solely in Ronnie's name, would be distributed according to intestacy laws, typically meaning that they would be divided among his surviving spouse and children.
In the absence of a valid will, the brand new BMW left for one of the witnesses would revert to the estate and be distributed according to the intestacy rules. The children Ronnie had with Sweet Emily and Veronica Bishop would likely share in the estate, with specific shares being determined by the jurisdiction's intestacy laws, which often prioritize the surviving spouse and the deceased's children.