Final answer:
The committee must consider the impact on local agriculture, the environmental objectives of reducing carbon footprint, customer loyalty, operational costs for staffing, and financial improvements for market facilities in order to decide whether to continue having a stall at the farmers' market.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering whether to continue having a stall at a farmers' market that has expanded its vendor criteria to include non-local produce, several normative considerations come into play. These considerations involve evaluating the impact of such a decision on various stakeholders and the overall objectives of the market.Increasing competition for local farmers who are struggling financially may lead to adverse effects on the local agricultural community and economy, which the committee must weigh against potential benefits.Reducing the market's carbon footprint aligns with environmental objectives, as produce that travels shorter distances generally results in fewer emissions.Losing shoppers who prioritize supporting local farmers might reduce the market's relevance and unique selling proposition, which could impact customer loyalty and retention.The cost of appointing extra staff to manage the site on Saturdays is a practical operational consideration that impacts the market's finances and resource allocation.Raising more money from stand fees to be able to upgrade the facilities at the market represents potential economic growth and enhanced shopper experience, which the committee must consider as part of sustainable development goals.The committee should thoroughly evaluate each of these aspects to make a decision that is in line with the market's guiding principles and the expectations of its stakeholders.