Final answer:
Elizabeth's decision-making would be considered logical if it follows evidence and logical reasoning without being influenced by personal emotions. Logic demands factual support and consistency with established truths, while decisions based on emotion may entail rejecting conflicting evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
To support the statement that Elizabeth makes her decisions and evaluations based on logic rather than emotion, we can refer to philosophical principles. Philosophers use critical thinking and reason to support their claims, ensuring that each claim is backed by evidence and a logical foundation. Elizabeth, if following this approach, would make decisions that are logical and supported by evidence, rather than swayed by emotional biases.
Identifying whether Elizabeth's decisions are made through logic involves examining factual support and consistency with established truths. A logical claim must be supported by and adhere to the rules of logic. If Elizabeth's decisions are empirical, one should verify that they correspond to fact, are consistent with other established truths, and have useful consequences. Decisions based on emotion might reject evidence that conflicts with desired beliefs or selectively look for supporting evidence while ignoring contradictory data. This is known as motivated reasoning, where one might, for example, have a preconceived stance on gun control and then gather evidence to support that stance while disregarding opposing evidence.