Final answer:
Plato concluded through the character of Socrates that individuals always opt for what they consider good, meaning that if they knew the good, they would do it. This comes from the belief that wrongdoing is due to ignorance. Thus, Plato did not settle on a simple answer but highlighted the pursuit of knowledge as key to morality.
Step-by-step explanation:
After a great deal of dialogue, Plato concluded that the question of 'would a person want to be moral?' does not have a straightforward answer. Plato, through the character of Socrates, suggested that people always choose what they perceive to be the good, and that wrongdoing stems from ignorance rather than a conscious desire to do evil. This idea is rooted in the notion that individuals would always want to do what is right if they truly understood what 'right' was, according to Socrates. Therefore, Plato did not reach a definitive conclusion that people would always choose to be moral in the way that we might expect, but rather that they would always pursue what seems good to them, which in many cases would align with being moral.
Plato's dialogues often explore the complexities of morality and the role of knowledge in moral choices. His approach suggests that becoming moral is more about gaining knowledge and understanding rather than simply choosing to do good. Morality, according to Plato's interpretation of Socratic thought, is intertwined with the pursuit of wisdom and the cultivation of the soul.