Final answer:
The statement about maximizing supporters' votes and minimizing opponents' votes in electoral campaigns is true, reflecting real campaign strategies and complexities, such as the voting cycle or Condorcet's paradox where no single outcome receives majority support.
Step-by-step explanation:
The strategy of maximizing the effect of supporters' votes and minimizing the effects of opponents' votes is a true phenomenon in electoral dynamics, especially in the context of political campaigns. Candidates actively seek to increase voter turnout among their supporters while aiming to weaken opponents' voter bases through various campaign strategies. These tactics include focusing on specific issues, targeting messaging, and strategic allocation of campaign funds. Furthermore, the concept of a voting cycle, where a majority preference does not lead to a conclusive outcome with more than two choices, illustrates the complexities of collective decision-making in a democracy. This can result in no single policy receiving a majority of support, a phenomenon known as Condorcet's paradox, leading to potential voting cycles or inconsistencies.