186k views
1 vote
Software ENG

Read the text on the spiral lifecycle model. Think of one or two reasons why the spiral life cycle model may not be appropriate for a medical device.

Give a benefit for using the Microsoft synchronize and stabilize lifecycle model instead of waterfall for a business software application.

Explain how waterfall would be a better fit for a medical device than rapid prototype.

User Gile
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The spiral lifecycle model might not be suitable for a medical device due to its complexity and the critical nature of medical device development, which demands stringent regulatory compliance and a more linear approach. Utilizing the Microsoft synchronize and stabilize lifecycle model for a business software application offers the benefit of iterative development cycles, allowing continuous feedback and enhancements, unlike the rigid sequential nature of the waterfall model.

Step-by-step explanation:

The spiral lifecycle model, while flexible and iterative, might not be ideal for medical devices due to specific industry regulations mandating a more stringent and controlled approach. Medical devices undergo rigorous validation and verification processes, demanding a more linear and systematic development method to meet stringent safety and regulatory requirements. The spiral model's iterative nature may pose challenges in documenting and validating each stage thoroughly, potentially complicating regulatory compliance in the medical device domain.

Conversely, the Microsoft synchronize and stabilize lifecycle model focuses on iterative development, allowing continuous improvement and adaptations based on evolving requirements. This model suits business software applications by offering flexibility in responding to changing market needs. Unlike the waterfall model, it promotes collaboration and feedback among stakeholders, enabling quicker adjustments and improvements.

Waterfall, with its sequential approach, might be better suited for medical devices due to its systematic and controlled phases. The waterfall model's linear structure allows for a clear definition of requirements, followed by distinct stages of development, testing, and validation. This sequential process is beneficial for medical devices where stringent documentation, validation, and regulatory compliance are crucial. Unlike rapid prototyping, the waterfall model provides a systematic approach ensuring meticulous documentation and thorough validation necessary for medical device development.

User GtotheB
by
7.3k points