Final answer:
Voter dissatisfaction is highlighted by many voters feeling they are choosing the "lesser of two evils" in presidential elections, with fluctuating satisfaction rates. There is also notable polarization between parties, especially on views regarding government control, which has widened over time and can impact voter preferences.
Step-by-step explanation:
The phenomenon of voting for the "lesser of two evils" in a presidential regime reflects voter dissatisfaction with the available candidates. In the 2016 US presidential election, a significant number of voters from both major parties expressed that neither of the major-party candidates would make a good president, with 46 percent of Republicans and 33 percent of Democrats holding that view. Moreover, the satisfaction rate with presidential candidates has fluctuated historically, never surpassing 72 percent and sometimes dipping as low as 33 percent. These statistics demonstrate that there is often a lack of enthusiasm for the candidates among the electorate.
Another aspect of voter sentiment is the perception of government control over daily lives, showing an example of polarization between the parties. The gap between Democrats and Republicans on this issue has grown, as highlighted by shifts in opinion from 1987 to 2012 and further widening by 2019 according to Pew research studies. These trends illustrate an increasing partisan divide on views towards the government's role in society. This polarization affects how voters perceive candidates and influence their choices come election time.