Final answer:
The question is concerned with social norms and status tied to gender roles and material wealth in ancient Roman society, where men were expected to be providers and women's rights were limited. Marriage often involved dowries, and a person's wealth greatly influenced their legal rights, social standing, and opportunities for success.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the context provided, it appears the question is asking about societal attitudes and the status of individuals based on material wealth and gender roles in ancient Rome. The phrase 'Low status: he hasn't been issued a woman, not even one' could be relating to practices of marriage, concubinage, or social norms where men were expected to be providers and women had limited rights and social mobility. In ancient Roman society, a man's status was often tied to his wealth, and marriage agreements often included a dowry, restricting lower-status individuals from marrying into wealthier families.
Women's social roles were restrictive; they lacked higher education opportunities and were excluded from many professional fields. Marriages were often more about alliances and wealth than companionship, and once married, women had limited rights to divorce or leave their husbands. Material wealth played a dominant role in one's social standing, legal rights, and opportunities for advancement, as described in the quotes from historical texts.
Social standing and wealth were interconnected in Roman society. Marriage and women's roles were dictated by social norms and legal constraints. Individual success, including familial relationships, legal positions, and even everyday interactions, was greatly influenced by a person's economic situation, further demonstrating the importance of wealth for status.