Final answer:
The scholar in question from 1976 is not directly identified, but the cultivation theory and research by scholars like Mirza Jan and the work of Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky on media influence are relevant to the analysis of media's impact from core to peripheral nations. Issues such as cultural imperialism and state censorship are key in understanding the flow of media and information.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scholar who began to critically analyze the impact of media from core nations to semi-peripheral and peripheral nations in 1976 is not explicitly known from the information provided. However, this period is known for the development of theories such as the cultivation theory, which suggests that media shapes a person's worldview. Research by Mirza Jan in 2009 pointed out the implications of media globalization, indicating that the public sphere is often dominated by the rich, Caucasoids, and English speakers.
The Arab Spring of 2011 demonstrated the power of technology and media in real-time information sharing. Concerns about media influence have been addressed by scholars like Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky with their work on Manufactured Consent, exploring how media elites shape popular sentiment, which has connections to the media's one-way flow of information and cultural bias.
This analysis relates broadly to the sociological implications of media and information flow highlighted in works such as Jan's research and Chomsky's, illustrating the societal effects and risks of media globalization. The international exchange of media and technology reflects the cultural, ideological, and information biases that can arise when media is dominated by certain nations, potentially leading to phenomena like cultural imperialism and state censorship in nations like China.
These discussions are pivotal in understanding the impact of media on global communications and the interaction between core and periphery nations.